Drift Protocol's $280M Hack Attributed to North Korea's Lazarus Group
Security researchers from Diverg, TRM Labs, and Elliptic have confirmed that North Korea's Lazarus Group (TraderTraitor) was behind the $280M exploit of DeFi protocol Drift. The attack marks Lazarus's 18th hack in 2026.
Blockchain security firms Diverg, TRM Labs, and Elliptic have jointly confirmed that North Korea's Lazarus Group — also tracked as TraderTraitor — orchestrated the $280 million exploit of DeFi protocol Drift Protocol. The same unit previously carried out attacks on Bybit ($1.5 billion) and Ronin ($625 million).
"1/10 We've been investigating the @DriftProtocol exploit ($285M) since April 1. We can confirm along with TRM Labs and Elliptic that North Korea's Lazarus Group (TraderTraitor). Same unit behind Bybit ($1.5B), Ronin ($625M). Was involved. Here's what our independent on-chain…" — Diverg (@DivergSec), original post
Why This Matters
According to Elliptic, the Drift exploit represents Lazarus's 18th attack since the beginning of 2026. The group's operational scope continues to expand — from centralized exchanges to DeFi protocols. In this case, the attacker compromised Drift's multisig not once but twice, including a freshly updated version that had been deployed just three days before the second breach.
Attack Preparation Timeline
The investigation revealed that preparations began well before the actual exploit. On March 11, the attacker withdrew 10 ETH via Tornado Cash at 15:24 Pyongyang time. The funds were routed through a chain of disposable wallets and cross-chain bridges.
By March 12, 50 SOL had been deposited to a token minting address, and by 09:58 Korean time the attacker had generated 750 million fake CVT tokens. The same address was used on the BSC network — 31.125 BNB was deposited through a signed transaction from MetaWallet, with funds following the same routing pattern as on Ethereum.
Researchers corrected earlier erroneous reports about attack funding. Initial claims suggested the hacker used 30 ETH from three Tornado Cash withdrawals. In reality, only one 10 ETH transaction belonged to the attacker — the other two were linked to an address poisoning service.
On March 27, the Drift team updated its Security Council rules: transaction confirmation required two of five signatures, with immediate execution. Just three days later, the attacker re-compromised the new multisig using a deferred signing mechanism.
Fund Extraction Strategy
Diverg reconstructed the complete fund extraction strategy using CoW Protocol's public API. Within 30 minutes, the attacker placed 10 orders through the CoW Swap web interface, converting $14.6 million USDC and 99.8 WBTC into approximately 13,150 ETH. All 10 transactions were confirmed on-chain.
A secondary accumulation wallet received funds from two sources:
- 390.86 ETH from Chainflip Vault;
- 846,000 USDC via Circle CCTP, subsequently converted into 397 ETH through CoW Protocol.
A total of 788 ETH was then moved to a holding address.
Lazarus Behavioral Fingerprint
All confirmed attacker actions aligned with Pyongyang working hours and occurred exclusively on weekdays. The methodology matches Lazarus's known operational profile:
- Preparatory phase utilizing Tornado Cash;
- Social engineering (fake job offers — mirroring the Bybit SafeWallet incident);
- Rapid cross-chain fund movement converging on Ethereum;
- Long-term holding of stolen assets.
However, Lazarus deployed a novel tactic in this case: minting fake CVT tokens and manipulating oracle data to artificially inflate collateral value.
Earlier in March 2026, Lazarus was also suspected of attacking crypto e-commerce platform Bitrefill.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who hacked Drift Protocol for $280 million?
Security researchers from Diverg, TRM Labs, and Elliptic confirmed that North Korea's Lazarus Group (TraderTraitor) was responsible. This is the same unit that previously attacked Bybit ($1.5B) and Ronin ($625M).
How was the Drift Protocol exploit carried out?
The attacker compromised the protocol's multisig wallet twice, including a newly updated version. They also minted fake CVT tokens and manipulated oracle data to artificially inflate collateral value.
How many attacks has Lazarus conducted in 2026?
According to Elliptic, the Drift hack was Lazarus's 18th attack since the start of 2026. The group continues to expand its operations across both centralized exchanges and DeFi protocols.
How were the stolen Drift funds laundered?
Within 30 minutes, the attacker placed 10 orders on CoW Swap, converting $14.6M USDC and 99.8 WBTC into approximately 13,150 ETH. Additional funds flowed through Chainflip Vault and Circle CCTP.
What evidence links the Drift hack to North Korea?
All confirmed attacker actions aligned with Pyongyang business hours and occurred only on weekdays. The methods match Lazarus's known profile: Tornado Cash preparation, social engineering tactics, and rapid cross-chain movement of funds into Ethereum.
Read also
Drift Protocol Hack Victims File Class Action Lawsuit Against Circle Over $230M in USDC
Over 100 victims of the Drift Protocol exploit have filed a class action lawsuit against Circle in Massachusetts court, accusing the USDC issuer of negligence and enabling hackers.
April 2026 Sets All-Time Record for Number of Crypto Hacks
April 2026 saw a record-breaking 24 crypto hacks resulting in approximately $651 million in total losses. Kelp and Drift Protocol suffered the largest exploits.
AI Audit Uncovers Critical Liveness Bug in Ethereum's Nethermind Client
Octane Security's AI discovered a high-severity vulnerability in the Nethermind execution client that could have halted block production for 38% of Ethereum mainnet validators. The Ethereum Foundation awarded a maximum $50,000 bounty.
TON Wallet Introduces Yield Vaults for BTC, ETH, and USDT Directly in Telegram
TON Wallet has launched yield vaults for BTC, ETH, and USDT directly within Telegram, offering up to 18% APY on stablecoins through partnerships with Morpho, TAC, and Re7.
Weekly Recap: Aave Ecosystem Rescue Mobilizes 100,000 ETH and Quantum Computer Cracks 15-Bit ECC Key
Bitcoin held near $78,000, the DeFi community rallied over 100,000 ETH to help Aave recover from the Kelp hack, and a researcher cracked a 15-bit ECC key on a quantum computer.
Stablecoin Transfer Volume Hits $10.5 Trillion in January — Highest Since April 2022
January stablecoin transaction volume surpassed $10.5 trillion, marking the highest monthly figure since April 2022. USDC led transfers while USDT maintained market cap dominance.
